A Conversation About Mark 16:9-20
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:33 am
Greetings,
This discussion is about Mark 16:9-20.
My view is that Mark 16:9-20 was part of the Gospel of Mark when the Gospel of Mark was initially used by the church. The available evidence, both internal and external, is not strong enough to prove that Mark 16:9-20 is not an integral part of the Gospel of Mark.
Does anyone here have an opposing view, plus the time to discuss this topic? If so I would enjoy hearing from you.
Yours in Christ,
Snapp
This discussion is about Mark 16:9-20.
My view is that Mark 16:9-20 was part of the Gospel of Mark when the Gospel of Mark was initially used by the church. The available evidence, both internal and external, is not strong enough to prove that Mark 16:9-20 is not an integral part of the Gospel of Mark.
Does anyone here have an opposing view, plus the time to discuss this topic? If so I would enjoy hearing from you.
Yours in Christ,
Snapp